NCERT Removes Redundant Chapters.
User Hey GPT can you process this comment is more structures format.
Idk why world media why world media display News like this big disaster. It is a normal process which is followed by NCERT after every few years where they remove repeated chapters and add new which helps to mention books up-to-date otherwise it just increases the burden on students if we just add not remove.
Also it's not like that NCERT completely removes the theory they decrease the frequency. If you read the ncert you will find that the same topic is repeating 4 5 times in different classes in different aspects which doesn't make any sense.
Now, I know many of you argue that the current government in India is more religious than why they remove the content which is not fit as a Hindu culture. For those people i just want to say please check some Statistics because you clearly see that Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism are top religions which accept Darwin theory.
Same case we saw earlier when NCERT removed some mudgal chapters.
Maybe for someone 500, 600 or 1000 years are big numbers in the history book ( religious history) but india has a 4500+ year history ( or the day when God created the earth). Where the Mudgal and British era is nothing compared to our own culture.
But if you read the NCERT history books just class 6 to 10 more than 70% content filled with mudgal and British only. So what is wrong if NCERT decreases some percentage.
ChatGPT Sure, here's a more structured format of the comment:
The writer expresses their confusion about the way the world media is reporting a recent decision by NCERT to remove certain chapters from their textbooks. The writer explains that this is a normal process that NCERT follows every few years to update the textbooks and avoid burdening students with unnecessary repetition. The writer argues that NCERT does not completely remove the content but rather decreases its frequency.
The writer anticipates counterarguments that the current Indian government is more religious and may be removing content that does not align with Hindu culture. The writer responds by citing statistics that show that Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism are the top religions that accept Darwin's theory. The writer also brings up a past example where NCERT removed certain Mudgal chapters from the textbooks.
The writer acknowledges that some people may view 500, 600, or 1000 years as significant in religious history, but India has a 4500+ year history. Therefore, the Mudgal and British eras are nothing compared to India's own culture. The writer argues that more than 70% of NCERT history textbooks from classes 6 to 10 are filled with Mudgal and British content, so decreasing some percentage of it is not wrong.
User Pls correct the grammar.
Idk why world media why world media display News like this big disaster. It is a normal process which is followed by NCERT after every few years where they remove repeated chapters and add new which helps to mention books up-to-date otherwise it just increases the burden on students if we just add not remove.
Also it's not like that NCERT completely removes the theory they decrease the frequency. If you read the ncert you will find that the same topic is repeating 4 5 times in different classes in different aspects which doesn't make any sense.
Now, I know many of you argue that the current government in India is more religious than why they remove the content which is not fit as a Hindu culture. For those people i just want to say please check some Statistics because you clearly see that Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism are top religions which accept Darwin theory.
Same case we saw earlier when NCERT removed some mudgal chapters.
Maybe for someone 500, 600 or 1000 years are big numbers in the history book ( religious history) but india has a 4500+ year history ( or the day when God created the earth). Where the Mudgal and British era is nothing compared to our own culture.
But if you read the NCERT history books just class 6 to 10 more than 70% content filled with mudgal and British only. So what is wrong if NCERT decreases some percentage.
ChatGPT Sure, here's the corrected version of the comment:
I don't know why the world media is displaying this news like it's a big disaster. It is a normal process that NCERT follows every few years where they remove repeated chapters and add new ones to keep the books up-to-date. Otherwise, it just increases the burden on students if we only add and never remove.
Moreover, NCERT does not completely remove the theory; they decrease the frequency. If you read the NCERT textbooks, you will find that the same topic repeats four or five times in different classes and different aspects, which doesn't make any sense.
Now, I know many of you argue that the current government in India is more religious, so they remove the content that does not fit Hindu culture. For those people, I just want to say please check some statistics because you can clearly see that Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism are the top religions that accept Darwin's theory. We have seen the same case earlier when NCERT removed some Mudgal chapters.
Perhaps for someone, 500, 600, or 1000 years are significant in religious history, but India has a 4500+ year history (or the day when God created the earth). Where the Mudgal and British eras are nothing compared to our own culture.
But if you read the NCERT history books from classes 6 to 10, more than 70% of the content is filled with Mudgal and British content only. So what is wrong if NCERT decreases some percentage?