Sure-Hit! - How Historically Accurate Karna?

wait. what? it wasn't karna who killed abhimanyu though. abhimanyu killed almost 10 of great warriors on duryodhana's side inside the formation and karna was the last one left and it is ALWAYS mentioned karna never used his full power because abhimanyu was really young. and ultimately, it was one of duryodhana's son lakshman who killed abhimanyu. not karna.

also, really what? karna wasnt the one who had the power to return the share. he was literally a rando there at that time.

also. there is a very ugly reason why karna is meant to be an antagonist here. also hinduism's teachings is exactly what makes arjuna not likable. karna is already demonized as it is for assumed to be a "low-caste" while arjuna hated karna for speaking up and against royalty when karna was meant to be a "low caste" when in fact, karna being calm and kind is one of his highest personality trait but people can not stand that. and arjuna obsessed with killing karna is p accurate too.

(i'm saying this as someone who has read mahabharata in the original script and 2 other languages and have followed every fate work with karna in it)

/r/grandorder Thread Parent