L2l1 S XddeddXd,2zwz2W laait laaiz Xl1z Assessable sW w take the reporting and actioning of accounts and seriously. We treat every report the same Szand follow the same process to determineWz.1z1 what action is necessary.
There are two accounts involved insl, dil s L sAccount A which was the account originally S by Ninja and Account B which is tied to a YouTube video we discovered
Accounts Accounts Accounts z2szS Oct 2nd, Account B was disabled for reasons unrelated to player reporting. We take the reporting and actioning of accounts very seriously. We treat every report the same and follow the same process to determine what action is necessary.
There are two accounts involved in this: Account A which was the account originally reported by Ninja and Account B which is tied to a YouTube video we discovered
On Oct 2nd, Account B was disabled for reasons unrelated to player reporting.
On Oct 3rd, Account A was reported by Ninja. It was investigated and not actioned due to lack of evidence.
On Oct 4th, Account A changed their display name away from the name reported on October 3.
On Nov 13th, Account B was re-enabled based on a review of the underlying system.
On Nov 17th, account B changed their display name to match the display name of account A at the time of Ninja's report.
We became aware of a YouTube video claiming that we banned (and then unbanned) account B based on Ninja's report, which is false. We hope this clears up the sequence of actions.
laa Oct 3rd, Account A was reported by Ninja. Liye Liye lIt was investigated and not actioned due to sss lAccounts ,ack of evidence. aait Ess Nov 17th, account B changed their display name to match the display name of account A at the time of Ninja's report.
2s
We became aware of a YouTube video claiming that we banned (and then unbanned) account B based on Ninja's report, which is false. We hope this clears up the sequence of actions.
ss
A