This one is even more fucked up:

"Something I can not shake took place today, well in the future but I witnessed it today. Our sector was the only one convived the machine did not make an error today. We were observing a location where AI has had a history of malfunctioning, our goal here was to find out what was causing these machines to go against protocol. They were not doing things of an abusive nature but the top tier told us zero risk means flawless operation. Each sector wrote up what they thought the issue was and each one less us claimed it was a signal speed issue. I do not know if this whole thing was a real issue or if this was synthesized as a training opportunity. No matter what it was, the issue was significant because there was no issue and the humans in the other sectors thought it was a problem thus creating another human problem. They literally manufactured the problem and issue because they could not grasp the fact that the AI was using accelerated tech to spin shadows around the crops. The AI had figured out that their own shadows were causing a % loss in yields. So at certain times of the day they were actually not using the coordinates initially programmed, this caused what appeared to be a visual disconnect in what the other groups thought was erratic behavior. The AI reprogrammed the paths to counteract the sun rays. After we presented the data, later tonight they confirmed we were right. The AI showed by going in linear opposite directions of the sun the shadows would limit disruption. To the AI this was significant enough to change the protocol. We did not win anything but I think the leads were forced to congratulate us because we out thought the AI created sector's idea that it was a coordinates corruption based. Small win for our sector"