This is honestly hilarious at this point.

And several hundred years or jurisprudence bears it out?

How could you honestly say that, when reality has shown that limiting personal campaign contributions has been a law and been considered constitutional since 1971?

Also, you are extremely suspect. Your post history is basically nothing but political rabblerousing,

Also untrue.

you've clearly got very little understanding of the Constitution

The irony of this is just too rich.

while advocating firmly for something it's not, and are basically just shitslinging in this thread as if you're a professor of law.

I've literally explained the current law, and why it's been considered constitutional by the entire American Judiciary for 46 years. It's pretty clear you're just making shit up as you go. You don't even know how the first amendment applies to you*. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how your rights obviously work, and you're clearly intent on remaining ignorant about the subject.

I'd suggest that anyone in this thread essentially ignore this person - they're extremely suspect and at this point is just spouting nonsense.

I'd suggest anyone in this thread look up what rights are afforded to them by the first amendment, and see why the laws have been the way they have for decades, instead of this fruit basket who doesn't understand the first their rights at even the most basic level.