You used sources. Yourself and the american media which you said earlier. Aka shit sources.

Writing "somali muslim rape" isn't really argumentation though. If you wonder why the rape statistics you read about it here.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden

There have been several international comparisons made, placing Sweden at the top end of the number of reported rapes. However, police procedures and legal definitions vary widely across countries, which makes it difficult to compare rape statistics.[8][9][10][11] For example, Sweden reformed its sex crime legislation and made the legal definition of rape much wider in 2005,[3][4][8][12] which largely explains a significant increase in the number of reported rapes in the ten-year period of 2004-2013.[13][14] The Swedish police also record each instance of sexual violence in every case separately, leading to an inflated number of cases compared to other countries.[8][11][15] Additionally, the Swedish police have improved the handling of rape cases, in an effort to increase the number of crimes reported.[8][14][16][17]

If you are unsure of wikipedia as a source, then you can watch the sources wikipedia used.

We're aware that our immigration politics is shitty but not nearly as bad as you try to "argue" if you can even call it that. And if you had known something about swedish politics you would see that the people of Sweden know this is a big problem which has lead to that the anti immigration party have recieved more votes.

I will not waste more time on you though. But educate yourself, use good sources for you statements and don't believe everything you read. When you actually have some knowledge in our country, its politics and some knowledge in how to have a argumentation and not just tell the same thing over and over again without using sources. Then, I will gladly discuss the problems my country has with you.