So why didn't he testify against Michael Jackson when he was 25? Fans and security. Doesn't Jordan Chandler have millions and could provide security himself? Why didn't Robson and Safechuck describe what Jordan Chandler couldn't do? Children and too long to remember. I understand. This trial was a farce and should never have taken place against Michael Jackson. The investigators had to stop doing this if there was no cooperation with a victim. Confidential information was even leaked from the Youth Authority to the press where Diane Dimond was behind it. Same thing with Victor Gutierrez. Such people should be serious and protect children to fight against csa? Such people do not thank a NAMBLA organization nor send books disguised as fan mail. I don't think the authorities in Santa Barbara County acted properly. Not investigators who hear Victor Gutierrez as the first witness, as if he had seen what happened to these boys through the crack in the door. Must be so because Robson and Safechuck claim what's in his book. The ring, wedding and certificate thing is weird. This story has been in the media for decades, and Safechuck, a professional actor, claims it's the truth. How does this story get into the media if it's the truth? Did Safechuck give an interview after a video shoot?