We're similar, and you are genuinely curious which is why you kept on.
I kept on because I love debates--that's who I am; I have always debated since highschool. I'm ending this debate because you can't give me evidence, you're like a lawyer with no evidence in court, how can I continue this debate? You're wasting my time.
Social science/liberal arts are very liberally biased. Hard sciences are different.
Once again--where is your proof?
Social darwinism was a very conservative leaning movement of the 1800s.
Which is ironic because social Darwinism is strongly economic based. The social Darwinism is based on the economically strong devouring the weak.
Economics is a soft science, your world viewed is under informed. There's more than just money data to be had out there. You've been completely washed neutral of your background and you resist learning about it.
Why is Economics soft science? Because it's a social science? Your views are based on social science too, you do realize that right? Political Science is a social science, not hard science.
If you want to debate hard science, which I also studied, then lets continue.
The vast majority of things you enjoy are white male made and invented, you can name the exceptions that prove the rule, but its true.
These white male that invented these majority thing are different from you and I. They invented things, we did not. You're just riding their glory to make yourself feel better
You also don't realize that skin color changes over time depending on where you live. If you were white and live near the equator, your off spring's skin will turn darker gradually in order to compensate from the intense Ultra-violet radiation. The darker the skin, the more protected it is from the UV light.
I also have knowledge in Biological Science main focus on Genetics
owning to their relative high IQs.
Which is why you are an inventor? Which is why you made a break through in research? Which is why you hold a bachelor, masters, phd? But it sounds like you don't. What was your highschool GPA? What have you done that characterizes a high IQ?
So tell me this, if white male are generally higher IQ--what characteristics do you poses that makes you have high IQ? Because this argument and your logic certainly makes you sounds your IQ isn't as high because A.) I proved evidence to you but you ignore it and claim it false, B.) You can't provide evidence, C.) You use circle logic, D.) Fallacious Arguments, E.) I Could go on.
WHEN YOU DEBATE, GIVE ME EVIDENCE AND PROOF
EVIDENCE AND PROOF
EVIDENCE AND PROOF
The fact that you never gave me evidence and proof makes me question your intelligence. I proved you the reason why "white males" invented the computer and why non-white males did not. Because BACK IN 1900's, NON-WHITES DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO TOP-TIER EDUCATION. How are you not getting this?
Jesus christ, it's true what they say. Debating with a white nationalist is like debating with a Christian. Circle logic, claiming hard evidence as false, and a complete waste of time.