Would this be a better story for the third Antman movie then what we got ?

Why does it matter? It’s science we don’t understand.

It's a power that solved the main problem of the last movie! That's why it matters. Make up an explanation.

Maybe they’ll explain it, or they won’t. It’s Ant-Man.

The third Ant Man movie is where they should've explained it. When will they have time to explain it again? In Moon Knight season 2? If Ant Man is so unimportant why did they bother to introduce the MAIN VILLAIN of the next Phases of the MCU in his third movie?

Yes. This is the Marvel Cinematic Universe where magic, space aliens, and microscopic universes are household concepts and you’re complaining about children learning science?

Not just science. Kids learn science in school all the time. Heck, they learn it by accident watching television sometimes. We are talking Quantum Physics. It requires a masters degree, and is heavily reliant on MATH, hence my inquiry about her learning compound fractions... Which... Yeah, she probably learned them before the blip, she was in 8th grade.

But how did he know how to smelt iron? There’s no way that was an elective.

But not a blacksmith.

He's established as smart enough to know the melting point of Iron, or whatever the first Iron Man suit was made of. Again, it's not so far of a leap in logic that an engineer with the free time of a billionaire knows how to build a suit of armor. Your comparing Blacksmith to QUANTUM. PHYSICIST.

No, Magic is magic. That exists here too.

Which she can't do either! Are you suggesting she learned magic to learn quantum physics!?!

Learning science is literally a thing children do all the time. I don’t get your problem when the rest of the world can develop superpowers from spider bites or be able to hit anything with an arrow without powers.

When a character is established as one thing first, and then a totally different thing without explanation, then it's not the same character. She's a new character now. I can buy Kate Bishop is a master archer because they established her motivation, worked in a montage of her learning how to short, fence and fight, and visually illustrated her success with a wall of trophies. I can believe Shuri is a genius without the montage or overview of her education because she was introduced and established as a genius from the jump. We've ONLY known her as a genius. Clint Barton was introduced as an expert marksman. We've only known him as an expert marksman. The spider bite's made-up-magic-science. it's a short cut to success and it's made-up-mumbo-jumbo, but it's an explanation of made-up-mumbo-jumbo, non the less.

My point was never that iT's iMpOsSiBlE fOr CaSsIe To KnOw StUfF, it was always that I wanted more information on this character. What she's been through, what she overcame and what transformed her from the average happy-go-lucky kid that wanted to be a superhero like her dad, into the quantum physicist superhero she is now-- And before you say it, I don't need an explanation as to how she's a superhero, like I need an explanation as to her prowess as a quantum physicist. That's one of the few things that was established about her in the first two movies, and yes Scott's an engineer, but he's also prone to carelessness, which has been established periodically through his first movies and previous appearances in the MCU. She would have easily been able to steal pym particles from her dad.

/r/marvelstudios Thread Parent