You are talking about women who are ready to risk seedy locales and groping men, just to earn a few bucks. These are women dedicated to their goals, whether it be paying for college or feeding their families.

The greatest problem facing economists is correct allocation of resources. Who should we give the means to achieve things. The answer? To those who work the hardest for it, to those who risk the most for it. Don't you think Strippers work hard and risk a lot [If nothing else, their reputations?]?

This is a field where insults and exploitation are rife, where the poorest of women, oppressed, shot down, try to make a living.

Forget the word strippers. You are helping poor women pay for tuition, food and amenities. You are achieving that which few people can! You are improving the economy by giving those most likely to spend money locally, the means to do so! Is there anything nobler?

And imagine if the stigma associated with 'stripping' is removed because of the money being pumped in [Though 10K a day is rather low for that]. You are promoting equality, by saying that women have nothing to be ashamed of about their bodies. You are promoting a healthy mindset by saying that sexuality is not taboo!

Strippers are often more athletic and healthier than the skeletons we seen on TV and magazines! I say chuck the Paris Fashion week, chuck Milan and Lyons! Pay the strippers!

Finally, think about the money being spent on porn. This is sucked up by the greedy producers who often exploit smaller actors and act as dumps of cash. They either don't spend that money, or spend it in distant places and outsourced data centers!

Paying strippers makes sense. You promote your local economy, you help those who want and need money the most get it and you destigmatize that which is natural and inherent to human nature.

God save the man who frequents the strip club! He is a hero worthy of salute.