Too many words, majesty?

I didn't realize you were in charge of how many words I can use - before violating your 'special' rule, apparently.

Where's your rule book? Have you properly listed in it - what 'requires an essay' and what doesn't? "I in no way meant to" make a mockery of your regime, or leave your 'special' policy - in tatters.

I was misinformed. Sorta like Bogart, in CASABLANCA. How badly, you ask? Good question - and aren't you the clever one to ask?

I was so mixed up I thought reddit was in charge here. I thought website admin (not you) - sets policies and practices.

Even - right - how many words one may post. But reddit isn't His Musical Majesty, is it?

Someone call AMADEUS. Maybe he'll trim one of his compositions, with 'too many notes.' The crown has made it clear, what you're afraid of - as you put it:

"I fear if you were to discuss such issues as this in real life, hell even on the Internet, the meaning of your/our 'cause' might get lost among the many intelligent words you use."

I don't share such fear. Nor would I care to. I'd politely decline to partake with Your Majesty, of such a 'tempting morsel' - even on such 'gracious' offer as yours.

Or did I oops do it again - see your pretense - i.e. "read a little too much into what [you] said" - (for your purpose saying it)?

Since I'm guilty of violating your rules - what's the sentence you'll hand down from your in-charge bench? What will my punishment be, how will you secure justice for my wrong doing?

How do you deal in general with those who defy your authority? Especially as wantonly as me - trampling your rules underfoot, like Godzilla crushing Tokyo Tower for a beer can, one stomp? Do you have a Gestapo - like some 'muscle' you could call for?

Or is pouting - whining - crybabying - your mightiest means of administering justice, and putting matters right - regardless how many words I go beyond what your little law will allow?

Totalitarianism sure comes in different colors and flavors. Und it doesn't allow word counts exceeding its limits - except that's always its excuse. Its what's being said, especially with clarity perforce - and authenticity, integrity of principle itself. That's what dictators and bullies of all kinds - don't like and never will.

But no matter how many words I use you poor violated rule mongerer - regardless how great my vocab - my words can't touch the depth of depravity I see going on parade here. Nobody's could. That's why Merton used the phrase "the Unspeakable" for the total absence of healthy values or boundaries you pose - and the kind of psychodrama taking the stage here with its bullhorn and demands - enacting itself like some 'cause.'

It smacks of cannibalism feeding on this suicide, grinding this young man's bones to make psychonaut's story bread.

To witness this unfolding Mother Goose spectacle o

The tasteless sarcasm trying to act itself witty or funny or 'satirical' - knows no shame for itself. It exemplifies a sickened, sickening state - a complete lack of healthy boundaries.

I wouldn't join the repast. Feasting on the remains of this young man as choice raw material for narrative pretensions - then trying to act like its something 'funny' - doesn't appeal. It poses a pure pretense, defiant of any authentic values or ethics - that I find appalling beyond words. But its nothing unusual, in fact sadly typical - more like rule than exception, in psychonaughty discourse.

How illustrative, as reflects on the 'values' of a 'such a subculture.' Yes the 'opportunism' as reflects - like, thru a glass darkly - is something you 'in no way meant to imply.' Agreed in transl: You never meant for anybody to see such decrepit ugliness (trying to pass itself off as wit, humor, satire? BADLY) - for what it is. How ever did you figure that out, what was your first clue Sherlock?

After all, the mystery was so 'thick.' Who wouldn't anyone 'see the humor' in a tragedy like this suicide? Who wouldn't want in on how it can be 'played' as if - a murder! Bloody murder!

The better for fickle fingers to point in rebuke, disapproval, recrimination -theatrically blaming anyone and everything in range - right?

This psychonautic discourse sure displays its features - content, manner of engagement, values - as if proudly. Like some naked emperor on parade 'showing off' how much higher and fancier his fashion sense and attire. Its a clear and present reflection on the psychosocial state of this psychonautic movement - or 'cause.'

Its a fundamentally sick mission crusade, of clear intent and grim determination - like so many we've seen - that can only exploit a tragedy like this - in opportunistic slimeball fashion.

The 'feeding frenzy' in clear evidence (let it be so written) wears its absence of conscience, of humanity itself - like some kind of crown. Its reprehensible, fit for revulsion.

And I do revile such concerted defiance of human worth, staging itself as if some Golden Standard - to which all must be subjugated, brought to heel. There's no end to its domination - even as to 'how many words' - or how many notes AMADEUS may compose.

I think we understand each other. And I don't have dirtbaggers for friends, 'friend.'