You say that it is time to bury the hatchet, but right before that you accuse me of acting on bad faith, when my accusation was based not on faith but on a previous discussion and thus fact, with provenance & traceability.

Just to make sure you are aware, I did not mind that this post was deleted in the least, I am quite certain it was reasonable in the eyes of not only your peers as verified by Antithesis , but the majority even though not all peers of mine from the community.

I replied as such because I owe it to every other person whose thread is being deleted, to ensure that their thread is being read, and then only after their time and effort is absorbed, judgment is rendered, especially when it is a person who is so inflexible and defers so quickly to their own interpretation of the rules as reasoning, that they might gloss over the post to mechanically press remove in a subreddit where the community expects leniency.

This is not TiA, the community was not built on inflexibility, it was built on laissez faire, on the side are not 35k readers, there is 30k+ anti-authoritarians. I know this, because I surveyed a large number of the members when this subreddit first started, replying to each one making attempts to incorporate in my replies of gratitude and often the results.

I encourage you to sometime reply to every person in a post post of your choosing in any community and learn about the people who make those comments and posts, what they believe in, and perhaps among which of serving them, serving immutable rules, or serving yourself you are doing the most of.

I will still reserve the right to criticize you on other actions, especially as my positions elsewhere require me to do so, but for your reading in particular, unless I witness proof in the future that it occurred again, I will no longer make assumptions on the past, and as long as the previous conditions are true, I will no longer hold that against you.