I'm not trying to start an argument, nor am I trying to be judge, jury, and executioner and say that because I think someone has committed a bannable offense, they should be. You are going off on a tangent that other players cannot judge what's wrong and what's right. I'm going by what HI-REZ THEMSELVES consider to be a bannable offense.

http://hi-rez.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/495/~/hi-rez-studios-suspension%2Fban-policy

We track and manage various in-game offenses in our games to try to maintain a fun, friendly in-game community. We apply suspensions for any of the following offenses: leaving, harassment, intentional feeding.

1st offense= 3 day ban
2nd offense= 7 day ban
3rd offense= 14 day ban
4th offense= 30 day ban
5th offense= 1 year ban

He has over 300 games. At the time they were all recorded as they are ranked games. All they have to do is check any one of the dozens of replays available, my screenshots, and look at how many reports this person has received considering everyone in my game reported him, and an enemy in the lobby even said, "Yeah I ran into that guy earlier today".

No offense but you are going off on a tangent and your argument makes zero sense considering this is very easy to prove with or without my screenshots, Hi-Rez considers this a bannable offense, and I never at any point suggested any type of "flawed" system - I simply said they are not punishing people.

This is a free game, I get this. Free to play games aren't a new concept. I've been playing free to play games since Neopets in the 90's. There are still policies to be upholded and bans to be handed out to those deserving of them.