There's no shame in being a teenager and questioning things.

Logic is up to interpretation. I could argue as a religious man that it's logical for god to have created us, so that we have a purpose. I could argue that it's logical to hate a group because it says so in my book. And I would have many supporters agreeing with my 'Logic'

I could argue as an atheist that an all powerful all loving god is impossible with mass suffering. I could argue that my conclusions should come from my own reasoning and not just to fit in with a group

If it is on the topic of a god in general, and not an all powerful all loving one (which is quite easy to disprove). Then we should define what it is that we mean.

That our life could've come from somewhere else?
That there is an all powerful mega being that we can push all unresolved questions onto?
That there is something watching over us?
That we have somewhere to go where we die?

I'll ask another question.
At what point do you accept that a particular religion is ridiculous?

When it has paradoxes?
Such as an all loving all powerful all loving god.

When it says something clearly wrong or immoral?
When it's obvious who wrote it?
When you see various systems of control?