Anything beyond that is an attempt to impose your morals on other people.

So laws against murder are imposing my morals on other people?

Honestly, I think the biggest setback to the pro-choice movement in decades was when they pivoted from "a fetus isn't a baby" to "a woman's right to control her body" because it's like they left the debate and went to another room to have a debate all on their own.

Most pro-lifers believe that a fetus is a life to be protected, and banning abortion is essentially an extension of making murder illegal.

Pro-choicers who prattle on about "a woman's right to choose" are completely missing the point, because nobody thinks a hotel owner has the right to fill their hotel with cyanide at 3am, even though it's their property and their building.

Yes, people have a right to control their own bodies. And yes, if you don't believe that a fetus is a human being, then that includes the rights of women to get abortions. But you can't leapfrog the "fetus isn't a person" thing just because it's uncomfortable or difficult.

(And if you made it this far without flaming me assuming I'm a pro-lifer: I'm pro-choice. I believe that a person is the sum of their thoughts, memories, dreams, and aspirations. A person is their personality. That's why to me a fetus is naught but a "potential person" that hasn't been started yet, and that's why a woman has the right to get an abortion - at least until the fetus is naturally viable on its own)