I did not read it through, since it seems to be an argument based off of emotion rather than what is presented to us in the books and other media. It seems to cherry pick certain details, and twist them to fit your own narrative rather than actually looking for what is the truth in this matter. It seems like many people just want to make the story into what they want instead of actually solving it to find out what is really going on. There will always be people who think that what they want the lore to be is not separate from what the lore actually is. If they developed more critical thinking skills then they would be able to see the distinction, however, it seems that so many people are trapped in a prison in their minds, in a closed minded, limited thinking mindset that prevents them from seeing what is right there in front of us. Of course, many humans tend to be emotional creatures, since we evolved from a more wildnerness oromted hunter and gatherer species, we always have that irrational emotional tendency to just think of whatever is most pleasing to us for whatever reason instead of considering the objective truth and what is actually presented in front of us. It's a defense mechanism in some ways. However, what distinguishes some humans from other types of humans is our ability to use our minds to consider the details and what they are pointing to instead of relying purely on our emotions. However, something that is somewhat off putting to the people who do think in terms of the broader scale of things is when people who do not use that way of thinking stubbornly cling to their emotions and want they want instead of considering what is there in front of us, hence why I did not fully read your reply. It is not using actual, full picture evidence to argue, and is instead, using emotional biases to argue, however, I would gladly read your argument if you thought of something better to defend your case with than simply what you want the story to be and what your emotions tell you is a better storytelling style or whatever it is that keeps you from looking at the broader scope of things. Until then, good day.