You can cry as much as you want about petty rules violations, but you went out of your way to insult me too lmao. My response was to try and start a conversation about the fact that we were not given the actual data, and I firmly believe that pickrate is the most important information we could be given (the information they specifically chose not to share), and that because of that this data IS useless. Not literally, but close to. I was supporting the conclusion made by the first reply. Anyway, if you are going to throw a fit about extremely benign name calling while name calling yourself and refusing to actually read what you reply to before asserting your own position into the discussion then it'd be better if we stop here.