Johnny depp is a victim of his own vices and addictions. Unless he assaulted someone again recently (which there's no truly valid or irrefutable video, photo, or witness proof that he has) he's respectable I think. He has assaulted paparazzi and others in the years after breaking up with Winona though

Amber Heard is likely a sociopath and pathological liar. There's irrefutable proof that she assaulted Johnny. She was arrested for DV toward an ex. I just think that's on a different, irrevocable level. I don't think it's fair to call Johnny a terrible person when he has made the world better for many people through his career, charity, etc. He is not a perfect man but he's had more flack proportionate to crime, including people like you calling him a terrible person. On what solid basis? A biased UK judge who takes something as flimsy only Amber's word as sound evidence, even though there's solid proof she's lying?