I see posts about Kevin's failure to do edits all the time, why can't I make a post about something that's already been discussed in order to make a re-evaluation? Also I have only just started to read this sub again so excuse me for not knowing about previous posts.

The other topic I have posted was trying to indirectly bring to people's attention that just constantly bashing Arin is not healthy or constructive. Bashing Arin is too commonplace on this sub and it isn't helping anyone. This sub's intention, I feel like, was to provide criticism in an environment that allows it, something the main sub does not. My other post was asking the question why did it just turn into 90% of everyone saying "fuck you, Arin"

And for the record, I would gladly change my opinion, this is a discussion though so changing each other's opinion isn't the end goal and I don't know why everyone seems to think that. The purpose of a discussion is to lay everything out, all of the points, arguments, and proof, about a topic so that we can all take a step back and view things from a different perspective. I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion in this thread because people can only do that for themselves. I just wanted to have a thread where both sides of the coin can be displayed instead of every single thread referencing Arin's response with no opposition.

I am here to play devil's advocate because no one seems to want to and it's turning this sub into a toxic hate zone. The brightest beam in this sub was the "What do you like about Arin?" thread and even that had 1 or 2 backhanded comments.

What' the point of anyone typing anything in this sub by your logic? Is this sub supposed to just turn into a circle jerk of "fuck new Game Grumps?" I feel most people post here in the hopes that the Grumps might see it and change, but that'll never happen if we don't settle the elephant in the room and if we keep insulting the members of Game Grumps (Kevin, Arin, and Suzy mostly)