this - problem I have with this commercial is the following things: firstly, the examples of girls being strong was the exact example of "x like a girl" that boys say to another (they lack proper form), therefore bad example... secondly, "like a girl" is an insult that boys say to another boy, naturally speaking men are made to fight, and women are made to love. Mars and Venus, it is of magic... the natural ways of the soul, the mind.. therefore, when a boy is a lesser fighter than another, by informing it to their lesser, they say so as "you are more a lover than a fighter" .. this is not a bad thing, but to them it is natural for them to inform upon ("peer, you are not a prime example of Mars, you are like Venus!"), it is truly only insult by inference, to the receiver of the message that is ashamed to not be the prime example of Mars (for a boy) ... the third problem I have with this commercial is that while they intend to reform what they perceive as a negative stereotype, they are enforcing the stereotype by acknowledging it, to acknowledge a negative variation of speech is naturally to enforce it, for, if it was Never acknowledged, it would not exist... the last reason this advert is wrong, is that it is not a public service advert, but rather a corporate shill. .. also, while true that a girl can be whatever they Will to be, to be a strong fighter, and not a strong lover as is their nature... by socially engineering a person to be against their nature is a "Sin"

all said, iam very much for empowering women, it is a great interest of mine to achieve, however this advert is faulty in a variety of ways, I perceive the chief desired result may be achieved in a better way.... ...

ALTHOUGH - the "chief desired result" of this advert is to sell tampons, and not to empower women. it may be said that the objective of empowering women was purposely eschewed, so as to cause controversy, which strengthens the "chief desired result" of selling tampons.

... those with a lesser mind for the matter may see that there is a problem with this advert, but not realize the real purpose for their distaste for the advert, and say this or that... but the primary thing to realize, is that this advert was engineered to promote Always and their tampons... any other conclusion to be made from the advert is irrelevant. .. they found a controversial topic, and played into it, for their benefit. this - problem I have with this commercial is the following things: firstly, the examples of girls being strong was the exact example of "x like a girl" that boys say to another (they lack proper form), therefore bad example... secondly, "like a girl" is an insult that boys say to another boy, naturally speaking men are made to fight, and women are made to love. Mars and Venus, it is of magic... the natural ways of the soul, the mind.. therefore, when a boy is a lesser fighter than another, by informing it to their lesser, they say so as "you are more a lover than a fighter" .. this is not a bad thing, but to them it is natural for them to inform upon ("peer, you are not a prime example of Mars, you are like Venus!"), it is truly only insult by inference, to the receiver of the message that is ashamed to not be the prime example of Mars (for a boy) ... the third problem I have with this commercial is that while they intend to reform what they perceive as a negative stereotype, they are enforcing the stereotype by acknowledging it, to acknowledge a negative variation of speech is naturally to enforce it, for, if it was Never acknowledged, it would not exist... the last reason this advert is wrong, is that it is not a public service advert, but rather a corporate shill. .. also, while true that a girl can be whatever they Will to be, to be a strong fighter, and not a strong lover as is their nature... by socially engineering a person to be against their nature is a "Sin"

all said, iam very much for empowering women, it is a great interest of mine to achieve, however this advert is faulty in a variety of ways, I perceive the chief desired result may be achieved in a better way.... ...

ALTHOUGH - the "chief desired result" of this advert is to sell tampons, and not to empower women. it may be said that the objective of empowering women was purposely eschewed, so as to cause controversy, which strengthens the "chief desired result" of selling tampons.

... those with a lesser mind for the matter may see that there is a problem with this advert, but not realize the real purpose for their distaste for the advert, and say this or that... but the primary thing to realize, is that this advert was engineered to promote Always and their tampons... any other conclusion to be made from the advert is irrelevant. .. they found a controversial topic, and played into it, for their benefit.