Thanks for the informative reply! I read up on Galton but I only found references to natural law pertaining to the process of biological natural selection. When I say "natural law" I'm talking about a the fully reduced (simplified/factored) law that is generalized to explain every phenomenon in the entirety of the natural world, i.e. "the law of nature". The phenomena and processes of life (aka "life) are a subset of nature, so we can't use inductive reasoning to generalize the phenomenon of natural selection alone to explain the principle operating arbitrary natural processes. But that's just a logical proof, so let me get more concrete.

Natural selection describes how the more fit are selected (it's a filter) - and it's obviously true.

But, when we talk about life, we also have to talk about the origin of life to have a complete picture. If we don't it would be like trying to understand an answer without the question.

I think we can show that certain combinations of conditions can produce self-replicating, apparently coherent chemical structures that look like they could turn into cells. But the reality is that we're running such a hypothetical experiment with the exact conditions found on Earth, including its specific gravity field. Without the specific conditions of gravity, those proto-cells would not self-assemble. Furthermore, we'd not even have the requisite chemistry or physics without the existence of gravity. That means we have a limiting factor on abiogenesis, which to any philosopher or true scientist investigating this matter should indicate we need to take a closer look at gravity first before we can understand our original question about abiogenesis.

And, one of the important problems is that gravity is not completely explained right now.

If we consider it a universal fact that the stronger eats the weaker, then such a thing ought to apply to gravity too.

However, gravity is not a static stress on space which is generated by mass like people are generally taught. It's actually generated by the activities of things in the world. See the stress-energy tensor from relativity.

It cannot be verified that this world does not operate deterministically, like quantum mechanics claims has already become an undeniable fact. And natural law itself requires that the entire world of phenomena is deterministic.

In any deterministic system, a result (like a fact or phenomenon) encodes its causes. If it didn't there'd be no ability for us to measure change, and therefore no concept of coherence or existence, and therefore no determinism. Like a fruit's seeds encode the entire past of the tree, a result always has its causes inside itself, encoded.

Therefore, since the origin of all life is gravity, and since gravity is generated by activities, the origin of life encodes prior activities. That might seem like a contradiction, but only because the matter is being observed with only half of the natural law.

I'd also like to point out one important fact for any Truth seekers - natural selection is also not a fully reduced law. So it's quite difficult to see the entire world of phenomena with that explanation alone.

I hope that was interesting. If you have any comments or questions I'll be interested to hear about them.