few things:

1. I am surprised with the last few sources not putting up pictures or just putting up pictures of stock without a note saying their username. In general these pictures only prove that they have the gear or have a friend who has the gear or something along these lines, it does not mean they are going to bother posting it but at least it is a first small step. The last like 3 or 4 sources maybe even more have not done this.

anabolicaok gymchemist testlanewtrencorp(lol) - did have a picture which was edited in paint(lol)

There might be more but those are the ones I can think of from the top of my head. I know the mods probably just missed this by accident but it even says this in the source rules in the wiki https://www.reddit.com/r/Steroidsourcetalk/wiki/source_rules maybe you guys could have like a tick sheet for what needs to be met before accepting them that way you will not miss anything.

1. Other thing I was wondering not sure what the rules are on it but personally pisses me off are when someone does a review request and then sources recommend themselves, I've not seen this much from the USA or international sources but maybe that's because I do not pay much attention to their posts but I know for Europe a lot recently someone will ask "who has good tren" and then sources start recommending themselves, now maybe they do have good tren or mast or test whatever... but in my opinion they should not be recommending themselves they are hardly going to say my tren is shit go to someone else. I would imagine most people requesting the reviews will realize going off the sources word is maybe not the best thing in the world to do but I honestly think it should be for people who have used the products to suggest certain things.

Not sure what others think but that is the only thing I have to cry about at the moment.