As you changed your original post with a whole bunch of edits, I'm going to respond to those (btw, don't do that. It makes the whole thread almost unreadable).

Nitpicking one point and then declaring the whole thing invalid

I am hoping that you are aware that in a logic chain, if one assumption or piece of the chain is invalid then, by definition, the whole thing is invalid.

That's how logic works.

Evolution is the interaction of species in an ecosystem which results in the development, enhancement, or the end of certain species or some forms of species.

This is not accurate and it has been explained to you why it is not accurate.

it is no secret that the modern day 'internet atheist' movement has developed into a form of pseudo-fundamentalist faith

This is erroneous.

I am hoping you understand why. But your posts indicate otherwise.

where any questioning is met with anger and the firm holding of beliefs is more important than a back and forth discourse, and the comments here are pretty clear that this is still so.

This is simply not true. You will not be able to show a single post where this occurs, because there aren't any.

You are confusing people pointing out your errors with "firm holding of belief." You are confusing and equivocating on the word 'belief', alternately using it to mean 'faith' and 'understand and accept due to evidence' and therefore being misleading.

Let's discuss what I mean by 'equality' here. Human beings.. the human species.. is considered 'equal' as a species.

Again, you said you'd explain it. Then didn't explain it.

What do you mean by equal? In what way? Are talking about biology? Social constructs? Law? Politics? Morality? Rights and privileges? Physical ability?

These are all distinct. None of these traits differ enough in our species to any significant degree.

Sure some groups have different traits, but we are all considered one.

One species? That's because we are one species.

For an educator, you seem remarkably immune to reading and thinking about the responses you have received. As an educator, I am sorely disappointed and fervently hope that you are not showing this lack of critical thought and inability to process information in your modelling for students and in your curriculum.

If there is no God, it is a marvel of human evolution that the human race has developed to the point of more or less equality when we have evolved separately from each other for almost 3 million years:

Again, this is simply wrong.

In fundamental ways.

And you have utterly ignored the many responses explaining why and how.

You appear to not even have read (or understood) the linked wikipedia article.

My own 'religious' ideas have been brought to question quite a lot.. I don't address it because it doesn't matter here.

Well, I can't agree with that. It is both the topic of this subreddit and addresses your approach to epistemology. Of what value to you is evidence? Why do you make the assumptions that you make? How do you determine what is real and true?

Atheism and New Atheism does not work for me.

As far as I can see, there is no such thing as 'new atheism.' Can you provide a clear definition?

What do you mean by 'doesn't work for me'?

Either we can show deities exist or we can't. That's it. It matters not at all how we respond emotionally to this.

I'm about to drink something and watch NHL.

Enjoy, and I'm hoping you're cheering for the correct team! ;-)

and a reason why I personally remain a theist after reading and thinking about things.

I can't help but notice you have not presented any evidence for this position.

A lot of people here reacted instantly with pretty angry hate when they saw me daring to go against their narrative.

You seem to be confusing disagreement with your position, and pointing out of errors in your knowledge and logic, with 'hate and anger.'