No, you missed the point.
I'm interested in hard facts not more breathless hyperbole.

Just look at this very article:

"...It has been unclear until now exactly which regions of the country were targeted by the ads. And while one source said that a large number of ads appeared in areas of the country that were not heavily contested in the elections, some clearly were geared at swaying public opinion in the most heavily contested battlegrounds..."

Now if you go to the actual article they have a link on the words, "swaying public opinion"
Wow, swaying public opinion huh, I bet you think that means anti-Hillary or pro-Trump. Not so fast, see the quote below from their own article they link to....

"...The apparent goal of the ads, the sources who spoke with CNN said, was to amplify political discord and fuel an atmosphere of incivility and chaos around the 2016 presidential campaign, not necessarily to promote one candidate or cause over another...."
http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/26/media/facebook-russia-ads/index.html

They say these ads weren't even promoting any particular candidate and in fact some were supporting BLM or gun rights. You must just skim headlines or something, because if you actually read these CNN articles they clearly do not back up your "as a patriot" shtick. You're outrage is baloney.