There are a number of posters who believe, or appear to believe, that no woman has anything of value to offer a man; that their vaginas are all they have to offer and that a vagina is nothing of value because there is always another one around the corner. AWALT is sometimes invoked to justify this belief.

For my money, AWALT is a statement - true statement - about hypergamy and sexual strategy. The tough thing about overgeneralizing it is pointed up by the sheer number of women I meet who really don't have much to offer a man; have never developed any of their personal qualities.

Fact is, though, there are women with talents; with virtues; women who can sing, or play an instrument, or paint my portrait, or brighten my day with their cheerful talk. There are women who can inspire my mind with discussions of science, or engineering, or medicine, or biology. There are women I can take to a museum and have it be a better trip than if I'd gone alone because of the discourse that happens. These women are hypergamous and employ the same sexual strategies as all women do, but if you use the red pill strategies back at them, their company is better than tolerable: it can enrich your life.

It is my opinion that a lot of this has to do with social class, which TRP doesn't talk enough about. Upper-class young women are encouraged to develop themselves and I think at least in part this is to give them something to think about other than the cock carousel. If you are a lower-class man, you may never even meet an upper-class woman, and in such a case you might well be forgiven for developing a cognitive bias that states that all women are characterless garbage.