If you're just defending the fact that Rosenbaum "shouldn't have been killed," you are defending a criminal who was trying to kill a child. The fact that the criminal also happens to be a violent pedophile and you still blame the child he attacked for even being there in the first place (protecting buildings from arson and giving medical care to those in need) rather than Rosenbaum for being there in the first place (burning down building, threatening and hurting people) just makes me question your motives.

The fact is that Americans have the right to protect minority owned businesses from arsonists, and the right to protect themselves from physical assault. I get that a lot of people hate that about America, but if your only opinion on this case is that Rittenhouse should not have been defending a minority owned business from arson and that doing so made it his own fault that a person who happened to be a violent pedophile tried to murder him in the streets, you need to go examine your ethics.