My problem with this argument is that it tries to apply physics theory on religion in a backwards way. First there is the belief that God exists, after that a scientist defines that our universe is bound on time and space. Then, and only then, religious people try to use it as an argument for their faith.

I personally dont question other people's faiths, but this is a clear example of pseudointelectualism.

When i say pseudointelectualism i dont mean that religious people are stupid or arguing in bad faith, but that their way of reasoning isnt valid. In science you first must check the evidence and then form a thesis to explain some phenomenon. Religion tries to do the exact opposite, first they have a conclusion, God exists, and then they go looking for evidence to back it up.