Well I don't think you're intelligent enough to merit an explanation of why everything you said is stupid, so I just wanted to tell you that you're dumb and be done with it. But I'm bored and have too much energy to sleep, so whatever. I was also a bit miffed by your weenie-ish PC disclaimer despite your views being the opposite. So not only are you socially regressive, you're a fucking wimp about it and can't own up to it. Here goes..
That being said, men and women are not the same. I feel like in the modern day, people try to act as if they are.
First of all, western society does not generally try act as if women and men are the same. Everybody recognizes there are certain biological differences. Western society simply has chosen to stop preemptively excluding entire classes of people from even getting the opportunity to participate in society on an equal level. There's a difference between trying to treat everyone like they're identical and simply lifting restrictions to allow people to thrive up to their capabilities. I really don't see many instances of what you're claiming, whereas what I'm describing is a fundamental part of most countries' constitutional law.
Do you understand what I'm saying? I really hope so because I'm not going to explain anything after this post.
Men and Women are biologically attracted to different things, it's reflected in society. Men are much much more obsessed with the way their partner looks. That's why you'll see 80 year old men with 20 year old women, but not the other way around.
Here you just make a bunch of baseless presumptions, giving zero support. You're just assuming facts. I don't know if you'll understand what I mean by this because you've probably got a shitty education that hasn't acquainted you with the fundamentals of logic, argumentation, or the scientific method.
Basically what I'm saying is that those conclusions should be at the END of your post and after you've given us a bunch of evidence that actually supports. This is an unfair trick for me to play though, since I already know you don't have it, unless you are capable of and willing to go off and find the results of a bunch of social sciences studies testing a hypothesis like "80 year old men end up with 20 year old women because men are way more obsessed with the way their partner looks". Also there's the problem of embedded assumptions since, if any of these differences were shown, you'd have to additionally show that they are biological in some way and not just from social upbringing. You just have a huge mountain to climb to support the kind of bullshit you're vomiting up.
Man... I'm not even halfway through that pile of shit comment of yours. I am tired now though, so that's good. I think I've done more than enough to explain to you why the fundamental claims are nothing more than pure speculation based on your own personal beliefs, which means they have about as much value as pile of dog shit on a sidewalk. The rest of your comment (the third paragraph) is just pure fucking gibberish. I'm not just insulting you for the hell of it; it really does make no sense at all.
Final note, I think it's hilarious you started your comment off with your pathetic disclaimer and ended with "If you want to deter a man, you cover the woman." You're a twat.