Precisely this. The angle it seems they're trying to take here is to subtly accuse any woman who doesn't whole heartedly support Clinton of hypocrisy and even sexism. I am a woman. I have immense respect for Clinton and how she's grown and evolved over the years, and I don't think a Clinton presidency would be bad. If I had to, I'd sure as hell vote for her. But I've just been elated ever since Bernie announced his running and until he completely fizzles out I'm behind him 200%. It's pretty insulting to suggest I'm not properly advocating for my own gender by voting for someone else within the Democratic party. I fully acknowledge that Bernie does have an advantage in terms of being able to shoot off radical reform ideology and appear on stage looking like a haggard old man - for Clinton, a woman maneuvering a man's playing field, that would never fly. She'd be crucified. Eccentric loveable grandfather figure is electable; the female version of that is not. I do feel bad for her in that way. I think she could be the progressive candidate that I want but America just isn't politically or socially ready to accept that level of IDGAF from a woman. We're still expected to be ultra put together. But, you know it's not like Sanders demeanor is all an act. He's genuine, and being a man, I unfortunately think he would have a better chance enacting the sort of reforms that would help women. Even further reason to vote for him, I don't feel a bit guilty supporting him over Clinton.

It's sad that there's a growing fight within the Democratic party over who would be a better candidate for women, suggesting that one cares more than the other. Both Clinton and Sanders want the same thing for women of this country, and it's sad that it can even be suggested that I'm immoral or voting against my best interests in some way by supporting someone other than Clinton.