Not irrelevant at all. It's directly relevant to your statement that my opinion is nothing more than a pessimistic assumption. It's absolutely relevant to what you just said. It's not a pessimistic assumption. It's the nature of the internet. You even just agreed lower down that what he is doing isn't effective lol. No amount of "pweeeease don't spoiwo fo me!" will do anything.

This isn't the internet, this is /r/witcher.

Go to /r/science or /r/AskHistorians and tell them they should stop being babies over rules and see how fast you get the banhammer. According to your logic, seeing as they're also on the hammer, the same logic applies to them. Yet in reality it doesn't.

The only difference is that this sub doesn't have that high level of moderation (yet).

Generalizing everything on the internet is stupid and making arguments based around that is irrelevant.

No there isn't.

He's literally already doing it.

There is something he can do that will make him delude himself into thinking he is doing something about it, but he isn't actually doing anything about it. Nothing will change.

Cool story based on your pessimistic worldview.

I'm not changing anything. He literally said that. It's a part of his OP. I don't need to change anything when it's what he said.

I wasn't referring to what he did or didn't say. I was referring to his point.

His point is A and he's using B and C and D to try to explain his point, which again is A. You're responding to D. He's not asking or posting about D. Just because D is in his comment, it doesn't mean that this post is about D. When responding to D, you're not adding to the subject at hand. It's a strawman.