You were polite so rather than get into the subjective points, I'll just address some of the objective points.

-- Hillary Clinton has been investigated on several occasions and not charged with a crime. It is inappropriate to label her a criminal. To do so it is ignoring the laws of our land, namely one of our most important tenets "Innocent until proven guilty." You'll note that despite countless lawsuits against him which he settled, I did not label Trump a criminal. (If you were innocent and had plenty of money to hire the best lawyers, would you settle?)

-- Bill Clinton has never been found guilty of "raping some girl." Same logic as above.

-- If you don't think race, gender, and religious intolerance are key issues in this transition, then you must be ignoring the uptick in hate crimes since Election Day. It's naive to say these factors did not play a role in the election. I'm glad they didn't play a role for you personally, but they clearly did for some subset of Americans who now feel emboldened to commit hate crimes in Trump's name. Trump has tweeted to denounce the cast of a Broadway show yet still hasn't tweeted to denounce hate crimes being committed in his name.

-- Trump does not have "more fancy diplomas than a lot of people." He has one bachelors degree. He studied 2 years at Fordham, 2 years at Wharton business school, and graduated with a bachelors degree in Economics. He did not graduate with honors. He does not hold any advanced degrees. I'm really struggling to see how you can believe a man who couldn't even finish business school with honors is a financial genius.