But if you think there is one fundamental thing I'm arguing for then you haven't been paying attention
Lol, this is the type of language that makes you sound like a conspiracy nut, fyi.
So how deep did you go? Lemme see: You didn't follow the conversation
Because you're all over the place with everything. It makes you seem like you're just rambling and ranting.
No. Stop that.
I am not a one-issue debater that believes in the holy word of basic income
Well, when that seems like your main point (but never said) to your initial ramblings, which would make sense in context, it's sometimes important to say wtf you're talking about. It's ok to have a point sometime and actually say what you're talking about, even if it is talking about a basic income, but it is important to actually say that instead of rambling about random things from the get-go. And this doesn't mean that point encompasses you as a whole.
But since I can't read your mind you tell me to fuck off after lots of ramblings, then end things (as you do) with the same type of thing "Good luck out there dude, you'll need it." with the same type of self-assured arrogance after incoherent ramblings as if everyone else just has no idea what's going on - this is exactly what makes you sound like an unhinged conspiracy nut.
I'm not saying this to try to win an argument on the internet. I'm saying this because you vehemently oppose conspiracy nuts (and actually gave an honest reply eventually), so as a courtesy I'm telling you why you sound like one/come across as one.
I know you won't take this as advice and instead will take it as an insult or opposition that you feel the need to disagree with and probably argue back at. But, at least I tried and gave you the opportunity to self-reflect.
Good luck "out there" yourself, friend. Because you honestly come across as an unhinged conspiracy nutjob the way you say things, and I know you don't want to, but you also will not believe anyone who tells it to you and will argue yourself deeper into that persona unfortunately.