I said: "Trump was far from supposed to win Iowa." You replied: "No shit."

I stopped reading there. Why? Because everything you are writing is contradicting itself. You wrote in your argument before "Trump was a sore loser and had to lie to cover for his defeat in the state he said he was sure to win".

So which was it then?

I can shoot a million holes in the arguments you are making, but I won't because honestly I don't give enough of a shit to waste anymore of my time doing it. You're moving the goalposts like crazy anyway and manipulating what really happened to justify your continued support of a candidate. I have at least acknowledged that my candidate is dishonest, and is known to be dishonest, while you just cannot wrap your head around the fact that releasing false information in the manner that Ted Cruz's campaign did is not only wrong, but borderline illegal.

Its pretty obvious that there is no point in having a mature discussion with you, and this is verified by your vast history of other very insightful comments, where you also run in circles, move the goalposts, and neglect facts (Ted Cruz likewise has no experience representing us as a country, he's a Senator. If anything Donald has the edge due to running a multi-national business). Your argument holds no water because of how frequently you contradict yourself. You are also putting words into my mouth, and answering with the arguments you want to hear and you think are appropriate (I never said anything about small government, for starters). You also are assuming certain issues are important to me, when in fact they are not (yes Donald Trump is an athiest, I'm Moravian. No it doesn't bother me in the slightest, no I am not being hoodwinked into thinking that he is). I can go on and on, but its bedtime for me so I can make class early tomorrow.