Does this show have incest? I know it's off topic but...
Don't read this, it's not all that relevant to my main point. This paragraph isn't needed, just know incest with no pregnancy is harmless.
Even if this show did contain incest, why would that be bad? In my mind, incest is comparable to homosexuality. It's just a small minority of people who don't hurt anyone. If there is no pregnancy it's fine, but even that argument is somewhat dicey, a perfect example being, age, medical history and your own health, these things can raise the risk of birth defects occurring but it's not illegal for those people to reproduce. Before someone says it, yes, you could potentially argue incest has a higher risk then some of things i mentioned but it depends, it really does. The point is that, they BOTH pose a risk, no matter how small it is, if we allow people who knowingly raise the risks of birth defects occurring, why should we only make incest illegal in the first place even if both things can screw the child over? Also, gay incest exists too. A lot of the major birth defects that come from incest the severe ones, it must be INBREEDING. This is where it becomes bad. Inbreeding is incest over multiple generations, keeping it in the family. This is where it's bad.
If we compare the two, a lot of common points used to defend homosexuality can be applied to incest.
It's rare, roughly only 4.5% of the US population is GBTq+.Incest is also rare.
What people do in their own lives behind closed doors is none of your business.
Biologically, life in general has evolved to avoid homosexuality or incest. If early humans mostly did incest or homosexuality, humans would have been died out.
Stop trying to control who people can't and mess with, its their lives not yours. If you like freedom then respect their freedom.
A lot of people might mention the whole power dynamic blah,blah, blah point I've seen a thousand times.
Parent and child? No, this isn't an argument against incest, this is a pedophile trying to hit on a kid. Obviously wrong. Assuming their offspring is at least 21 or older, don't need any help from their parents can take care of themselves, I don't see a problem with the parent and child being together but uh, no reproduction. Consensual adults so why not? They have no real power over you as an adult.
Siblings ? No, they can't have a relationship in the same household, if they were completely unrelated, this would STILL create problems. Imagine them breaking up and still living together, LOL. Whether they are close in age or there is a big age difference, living in the same household, still bad. They live on their own? Even if the age difference is big or small, they can take care of themselves so why not?
Cousins, assuming they weren't closely raised in the same household, why not? Even reproduction may be fine. You can figure out the age thing on your own right?
Uncles and aunts with child? They still young? It's wrong. Completely unrelated, still wrong. Can the child survive on their own and are at least 21 or older?
Either way, notice a trend in all my scenario's? If you just remove the fact they are unrelated, it's still bad. This means, it has nothing to do with incest and all to do with power dynamics.
This was a copy pasta.