honestly i think people were attacking undeservedly initially and i should have led with that because i truly empathise with you and i dont think it's ok that folks are responding as if you are somehow bad or worth demonising. sorry for not doing that because i realise that without it i just am adding to an unfair pile-on. i understand where you're personally coming from in terms of relating to your sexuality. i dont think you should be shamed for it at all and i think jinkx' promoting of this OF is completely different dynamics even tho i can see why it would strike a nerve in u to defend her. all i wanted to say was that them encouraging their millions of people strong audience to go consume porn that's clearly based on sexualising extreme childlike looks and normalising viewing baby features in a sexual context is harmful. like maybe in their private life there's some specificity idk but just straight up telling the world "go look at this sexy babyboy i support you" is understandably setting kind of a fucked up standard for ppl to not immediately be concerned and wary about people openly fetishising children/babies. again i'm not saying anything about jinkx' own relationship to the material or that jinkx would fetishise children But when you promote such imagery so publicly on a societal level someone doing that has an effect where people become desensitised, and that's dangerous. and it's been happening historically in US culture for ages too, just look at brooke shields as one tiny example. so yeah i'm sorry you've been vilified you don't deserve it. x