I like how you say:
I do not have the time to read it.
Then let me rephrase what I had said. "I do not wish to waste my time reading it." And I was correct for the most part! Almost all the information you posted had nothing to do with a lion or a jaguar fighting a polar bear in the wild. It was simply about bears fighting each other in a human-controlled environment.
Then want to act as if your knowledge is universal, in that case whos trollin?
Uhhhh still you..... Because:
Every single link you have given to me argues that a polar bear can be killed by another bear, which is widely accepted by the rest of the world. But it still has nothing to do with this thread.
2) A bear can be killed by another bear. Nobody disagrees. But that is not what this thread is about, now is it?
3) All of those fights between those bears took place a while ago. Not only that, they were in a controlled environment. This thread is not asking about the lion, jaguar, and polar bear fighting in a controlled area. The setting is literally yellow-stone which is anything but a cage-match or a zoo!
4) I've read the other comments in that other thread. You went from arguing about if a big cat such as a tiger or lion could kill a Kodiak bear right? Then you immediately went and started arguing about skull size and density and even claimed that a lion could break a bear's spine with ONE HIT.
5) As for my universal knowledge, it is rather universal considering that, again, the polar bear is the largest land carnivore, and that it is larger than a lion or a jaguar. Just look at the rest of the people who commented in the thread. Majority of people have agreed that the polar bear would win. You can argue as much as you want but the general consensus is that the polar bear would win.
You don't even know what I post (actual accounts)
Ohhhhhhh watch out everybody! We have a badass!
So.... This is not your actual account? That actually makes way to much sense.
2) I was already wondering if you are a person who created a side-account just to do this. Considering that this is not your actual account, the argument that you are simply trolling others is even more prominent.
3) "You don't even know what I post (actual accounts)" I love how you had to add in "actual accounts." Otherwise, I would have looked at the account you are using and then laugh really hard. However, this brings up another question.......
4) Should I really care? So you have other "actual accounts." Since this argument you want to have is clearly unrelated to the actual discussion, I will play along. Why should I honestly care about your other accounts? Obviously you created this account with the sole intention of trolling. Why else you you not be using your "other accounts?" Clearly because you care a wee bit about your reputation and you are worried others would see you as a troll if you used your "actual account."
What education level or credential do you have that disputes anything Ive said?
Oh so we are going to do this huh? Well I might as well ask you the same thing!
B) All you have done is post links to proves arguments that nobody else disagrees because it actually happened (and could happen on a very rare occasion if it happened in the wild) but it also has absolutely nothing to do with the thread.
C) As I look farther down your comment, your education level might as well be brought into question as well because you clearly did not read my original answer as I stated that the Polar Bear would have a better chance of winning and would win 8-9/10. I never said it was a god or undefeatable.
How can a fact be disputed? It can only be either accepted or denied. You havent disputed anything, you're just in denial...two different things.
A fact can be disputed if that fact is false and there is another fact that proves that fact to be false. So far, as I have said repeatedly, you have given facts that really do not prove a lion or a jaguar can take out a polar bear. You have only proven that they can be killed. I am not in denial. You are as you clearly claim that a lion could break a Kodiak bear's spine.
There isnt a single polar bear killing a tiger or lion video or any big cat like a puma, should I then say its impossible because there is no so call actual proof?
Perhaps there isn't a single video of a polar bear killing a lion or a jaguar because they live in completely different environments. None of them can ever really encounter each other unless of course it was in a controlled environment, which would still be slightly inaccurate because it is not in the wild.
No one has anything against bears, just loud mouths like you who think because something out weighs something else, (not even largely by) then all of sudden the out-weigher is a un-killable god.
Oh, I'm sorry. Did I say that the polar bear is unkillable? Did I actually state that the polar bear is a god? No, i did not ever do that. Not even a little bit.
2) If you actually read my original answer, I said that the "polar bear wins 8-9/10" I did not state that the polar bear would win 10/10. I said it would win 8-9/10. This is so because I took into account that there is small chance that the lion and jaguar could win.
3) Again, did I really state that the polar bear is invincible? No, that is simply what you believe I said. What I actually said was that considering the fact that a Polar Bear is larger, possibly weighs more, and is 100% carnivorous compared to the grizzly bear (which is already rather dangerous), it has a much better chance of winning. I did not say it would win 10/10. I simply said it has a better chance of winning.
4) Oh so I am a loud mouth am I? So now you must insult me? Did you actually specifically single me out because you happen to disagree with me simply because you dislike me? Your main motivation to argue with me was just because you assumed that I believed polar bears are gods, which goes to show that you really did not read my comment very well.
I like how you bold letter THE LARGEST LAND CARNIVORE IN THE WORLD. Ha ha ha:
oh? Is that whole sentence just one letter? Is each and every single one of those words that I had bolded just one letter? Nah.....
2) Also, it is 100% fact. What do you have against me stating, in bold, that the polar bear is the largest land carnivore?
That abstract came from the Department of biological science in fairbanks alaska....I dought you know more than an entire university, so calm down with your retarded retorts.
"Rule 1: Be nice" You have continuously insulted me throughout your reply. Whether this was simply done in order to prove your point or to try and hurt me, I do not know. But you have clearly broken the rule.
2) I read the post. It was about an encounter between a wolverine and a polar bear.
A lion is vastly more powerful than a wolverine or a sloth bear
it has been stated in that post that a wolverine is noted for its strength and fearlessness. A lion is not fearless and tries to avoid other large predators.
2) A wolverine is smaller than a lion. Therefore, you argument falls to pieces since a lion cannot do the same thing without suffering damage.
3) a lion is not a wolverine and would not attack in the same way