Good thing TRP isn't a democracy. I've stickied this now, so it's going to be at the top whether closet fascists want it there or not.

I agree with the strong handed moderating, but I don't understand this post. It seems very incoherent with too many unrelated concepts to understand the message. Many people here don't understand the post, could you help explain it for us? Especially since you think this is stick-worthy, there must be something important that people are missing.

Could you explain the meaning behind these statements?

The Red Pill is based on the idea that you develop a strong Frame which then becomes a platform to execute skilled Game.

This is a powerful message, but none of the body or conclusion have anything to do with creating frame, or executing game. Or do they and I don't know what those terms mean again?

There is no following in Red Pill.

I disagree, I think following is an important part of life, this is how you gain knowledge from masters, but that is the common meaning of following.

Is "following" here trying to refer to a second meaning something like "surrendering" or "capitulating"?

Is he talking about the noun following: ie. the justin bieber following? This would make the most sense but...

The Blue Pill is our present day emotional indoctrination process which through all the current technologies (tv, news, movies, internet, schools, etc) attempts to achieve the same goal which is to create a now global citizen who is a follower.

Here the word follower is used, but in a different context, the meaning appears to be "follower" = "consumer". In this context, follower and following aren't related, why did he switch terms, or is he talking about a different context, and what is the context?

When a young man comes here to the Red Pill after having first realized that the Blue Pill is a fraud and a mythology his first inclination is anger. We accept this as the "Anger Phase".

There is danger in this moment.

At this critical point of awakening when the anger is highest the still mostly beta mind is vulnerable to the Scapegoat Mechanism.

This is the most pertinent message, that on beginning to swallow the red pill that you may fall into entitlement behaviours.

But this is unrelated to the post (it deserves it's own post).

What is the link? Where are the descriptions of developing frame or executing game?

The conclusion is also ambiguous.

Following is central to all suppressed consciousness ideologies.

'SCI' is a really complicated term, the statement itself hasn't been justified in this post. This is circular reasoning, early it was said "The unifying characteristic ... is to be a follower" then it is concluded to be true. What? In the Misandry Bubble (sidebar) the ideas are thoroughly fleshed out, the conclusion comes naturally. For this I don't understand the reasoning, or the link to trp. Could you please explain it?

Red Pill makes a blanket statement that we do not follow.

No it doesn't, I have never, every heard this. isn't TRP about:

Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

How is this related to sexual strategy? Could you please explain the link? Is me asking for clarification literally missing the point of not being a follower?

This even applies to the Men's Rights Movements.

What is "This"? There are so many different concept here, is MRM a Supressed Conciousness Ideology (ie. taking a 'negative' view on MRM)? Is MRM the same as TRP with the "We Don't Follow"? Is MRM falling victim to the scapegoat mechanic? Is TRP also applied to MRM (ie. meta 'This' talking about the discussion we are all having here)?

Seriously wtf is this trying to say. I'm completely lost here. Have I been reading and practising a completely different red pill? Could you please enlighten?