The article’s author essentially dismantles his own premise/argument by admitting that the separation of church and state is never explicitly mentioned in the first amendment or constitution, and then spends the remained of his 10,000 word essay trying to convince his viewership that he should still be taken seriously. The formulation of the idea behind the separation of church and state was to keep the government from intervening in religion, not the other way around.

It’s a shame people from opposing parties can’t have more moderate conversations without derogatory remarks. If you don’t think most democrats are mean spirited, just read the comments that my comment generates.