Again, more scarecrow arguments. You're arguing as to why their phones become obsolete. Did I say their phones never become obsolete? No. Did anyone say that? No. Let me again restate what you said which you have yet to back up: "Samsung are the kings of planned obsolescence". Is it planned? Maybe. That's your claim, but you haven't said or shown anything that is objectively true relating to it. All you have done is said things that are true but don't actually prove your statement.

I don't care about Samsung, I don't think I own any of their shares, I don't work for them. I'm not a stakeholder. I don't know if you're right or wrong, and don't care. My point is you aren't backing up anything you're saying, just dodging the point and trying to make it seem like you're doing something more than making pseudo-arguments, which irrationally annoys me.

Don't worry about trying to argue your original point to me because I don't necessarily disagree with you; I'm just critiquing your lazy argument style which everyone seems to share.