I still gotta question something. In that report it said this "It only includes pieces issued after 2006, when the program formally started."

Does this not give them ample time to comb through things?

Nobody has also refuted that they sold evidence either "The Port Authority, in 2006, started a formal program to disperse the artifacts. Because it comes from a crime scene, the release of each piece had to be approved by a federal judge." So why would evidence be sold as scrap and without a judge? Couldn't we have set it aside, wouldn't that be rational?

I get the logic in getting it out to move things along but everything just seems so easily exploited by secrecy and ill intent. I'm pretty sure I'm just digging way too far into details. Do I sound crazy for seeing it that way? I see red flags everytime.

I mean, those are genuine pieces but at the back of my head I'm thinking, how much of this could we piece together? Would the total 2,600 donated pieces be enough to put together a single leg of one building? How much of this donated material is rubble vs actual steel? The reasons given seem so vague and trusting in authority figures.