No, no, no. You rubes have got it all wrong. You've clearly fallen deep into the trap set by the artist as this is a post-modern, post-art deconstruction and parody of the very meaning of meaning itself. The references to cubism and isolationism are merely a facade masking the artist's unbridled scorn for the overreaching pedantry of the modern critic. See the way he shows his disregard for the audience in the wildly unhammered edges of the ice melting before our very eyes? The use of such a facsimile for the pure glass traditionally seen within the genre suggests deeper meaning but is actually something of a prank. By debasing the sanctity of the medium, the artist challenges the audience to see the display as art or even as