I believe the criticism Corbyn levelled at the EHRC opens him up to litigation not only from them for also others as EHRC have the right to intervene in other court proceedings.

Stating that complaints are exaggerated calls the entire report into question. He may be right - and he’d be free to say complaints might be exaggerated. But to do so on that day was just a bad idea. Because it can be directly attributed to the EHRC (as opposed to others).

Suspension works both ways - it protects the party but it also protects Corbyn from further indicting himself.

I can’t point to the specific rule. You and I both know Labour rules are extremely complex. If the above logic is not a rule, it should be!

This is why Starmer (a legal professional) above all else was extremely clear in making it known that he (as leader of the party) “accepted the findings”.