I assume you're talking about the Qatar donation

Ronald Reagan got $2M after he left office from Japan's Fujisankei communications conglomerate.

And afaik, the Clinton foundation actually does good work, as opposed to the fraudulent Trump foundation.

That cheque was to present something they promised in 2011.

Given an A to A+ rating from EVERY independent watchdog of charitable organizations.

Given that the Foundation does remarkable work, it shouldn't be surprising at all that it attracts substantial donations. If you want to try to prove some sort of pay for access scandal you need to substantiate it with more than your large, tinfoil hat.

If you're going to claim that a donation to the Clinton Foundation was some sort of bribe to get Hillary Clinton (who was not a Board member) to do something on behalf of Qatar, you've kinda got the onus to identify the quo, you know?

I see no relation between her appointment and donations to the foundation. I do see a relation between oil and coal company donations to Repubs and the denial of global warming and its major danger to the world.

Here's something current to be interested in tough: Trump's tax returns