3. What If we didn't have human needs (physical, social, and esteem)?

What If we didn't have human needs (physical, social, and esteem)?

I would contend there would be no "our" world. Each person would live in a solipsistic shell without some biological or emotional need to force their attention elsewhere.

Without physical needs, there is no benefit in engaging in a social structure designed to protect the group. There is no need for expertise from others, no biological drives for food or sex or safety, no need for creating grand cultural achievements.

No social needs is fairly self explanatory.

Curiosity might cause some interaction, but even then, one could argue after enough time we wpuld evolve away from even that being fulfilling. Discovery without recognition that fulfills no needs in the discoverer would have little appeal.

So, basically, a bunch of floaty spectres largely ignoring each other doing little to nothing.

/r/philosophy Thread
Previous
Next

Recently removed from /r/philosophy

Miyamoto Musashi's philosophy of "winning without fighting" is a central theme throughout his lif. This idea involves using intelligence and understanding of the situation to achieve victory without resorting to violence. From Self-Harm to Terrorism: Unveiling the Potential Misuse of ChatGPT for Enabling Harmful Conversations and Illicit Actions How Americans Define Truth Boenhoffer's Theory of Stupidity argues that it is more an enemy of the Good than Malice because while "one may protest against evil; it can it can be exposed and prevented by the use of force, [but] against stupidity we are defenceless...Reasons fall on deaf ears". The Dark Aspect of Therapy The afterlife is in our heads: consciousness and near-death experiences The moral implications of building true AIs It’s comforting to think those who disagree with our beliefs are simply irrational. But that isn’t the case. Many complex factors motivate beliefs, and properly understanding them is vital. Mike Huemer: Abortion Is Difficult We do what we do because of who we are. We can’t be ultimately morally responsible for what we do without also being responsible for who we are, which is impossible | Galen Strawson. Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and the meaning of suffering | Every life contains a good deal of suffering, what counts is how we respond to it - our best course of action might be to laugh. Suicide prevention laws are functionally the same as blasphemy laws In Support of a Fundamental Right to Die: an argument from personal liberty None of us are entirely self-made. We must recognise what we owe to the communities that make personal success possible. – Michael Sandel on the tyranny of merit. Scientists are fraught with errors, biases and conflicts of interest, but the only thing that beats science is better science.

More Random Comments

Most Redditors aren't pro-science Twelve year old is now van gough The Arcana Forge! For all your drafts, ideas, requests and more. Man parks his truck in the middle of the street to harass someone for writing "Abolish ICE" on the sidewalk If a kid commits suicide due to bullying and it was reported, the school should be held liable for murder. People who had to quit their jobs due to stress: what was the job and why was it so stressful? Should husbands help with the weekend housework? (1961) | RetroFocus Can homeschooling be done right? HS Teachers - How do you keep your students off their phones? How does a programmer who knows nothing about art make the art for his game? 'A personal relationship with God'? 30 [M4F] Toronto, Canada Feeling lonely and would like someone to talk with. Why not rewrite the bible to remove all endorsements of slavery (and other immoral things)? [Libertarians] How come people have to be owned, but land can be unowned? Amazon income and work conditions are brutal & not sufficient to get me out of homelessness. Why live anymore?