Well that is interesting but I was refering to actual science. What you described was mearly change NOT evolution. Evolution requires a species to become a new species. A boy does not evolve into a skater from a walker. That is just a learned skill similar to a baby learning to crawl. His DNA has not changed.
There is not a single instance in the world where anyone or any living thing has spontaneously or otherwise added a chromosome. Mutations happen all the time, but they are ALWAYS in the direction of deterioration. This is called devolution. This one point puts into question the whole comcept of evolution. Lets take for example the evolution of living creatures from the sea to land. To make that change requires a change in DNA that is not a deterioration but a new system that is capable of tranfering oxygen from air as oposed to liquid. Yet there is zero evidence that this has ever happened. You would think that considering the number of species that have lived on earth that might have been whitnessed at least once. But now let me add a little to this already impossible event. If only one male or female did evolve then it would be a singular event since we know that in most cases it takes both a male and a female with the exact same number of and posision chromosome to reproduce another of thier own kind. If you are a statistician, which is also science, you would know that the chances of any one of those things happening in a relativly close time period enough for this new evolved species to continue to procreate is far less likely than winning the lottery week after week for a year. Scientists use statistical probabities all the time to.decide if a hypothesis is valid or not. But for some odd reason no matter how ridiculous the probability of these events taking place at the right time and perfectly so that a new species is created, they still want you and I to believe it. I would say thay those scientists have far more faith than any religious person I know. Keep in mind none of these required events have ever been witnessed or evidence been presented. You and all evolutionist scientists have faith that they must have taken place otherwise evolution is a farce. But when I say that we were created by a being that is more intelligent that you and me scientists screen that I'm a fool. Yet at the same time these same scientists are likely to argue that there are aliens out there they are more intelligent than us, but they think that the alien species are green and ugly with giant eyeballs. If they are more intelligent why would they allow themselves to look so hidious? :-)