Sturgeon doesn't want to a second referendum because the EU is great she want's a second referendum because the UK inside and outside the EU are two very different nations. Scotland voted to remain the rest voted out in her eyes that gives her a mandate to see if the Scottish people still want to stay in the UK given that their opinions don't mean anything on matters like this (i'm not saying I agree with this view just that that's the view).

But that's secondary my interest is still in your argument. How can you define something as being really really shit if you can't define what's good about it? And incidentally care to quantify what really really shit is?

I should point out I'm not here to sell you on shit I didn't vote because it actually doesn't effect me too much either way, I hold dual citizenship and work in an industry which hires from all over the world anyway. What I am interested in is what you actually voted for (or against for that matter) since much like you no one seems to able to tell me why they voted leave without invoking a vague notion of British identity which they can't define and then get angry about.