What's your most outrageously controversial wrestling opinion you keep to yourself?

Funny thing is that I actually quite like that style of fast-paced, highly choreographed action when it involves two wrestlers who work that style best (i.e. Eddie vs Rey at Halloween Havoc) but Finn tends to use it every match, regardless of how it might not gel with another opponent's style. Against guys like Joe and Corbin, it doesn't look like his moves make much of an impact against them. I have to admit though, that ladder match against KO was insanely good. I'd like to maybe see him slow it down a tad, and make each of his movements mean something within the context of the story he is trying to tell. Like when he gave Hideo that brutal dropkick into the corner. He realized he respected his friend too much and in order to put him down he had to go balls out. Hideo sold it like being shot by a cannon, and turned out to be the highlight of the match. After that Finn just started using it as a setup move, losing what made it special. I'm going on this tangent but as I type I'm starting to realize that this is pretty much standard in WWE. A superstar unleashes a move that is unique to the story of a match, then starts to just use it on a regular basis as part of his/her repertoire. It's probably not even Balor's fault; the brass sees that he did something that got a good reaction, then want him to just start using it in every match, regardless of it means anything or not. Goddamn, I've got this shit all backwards. Still though, I'd like to see him step up his psychology game and play off of his opponents' characteristics rather than using the same sequences and high spots, or else he'll be condemned to a "five moves of doom" guy. Ok, I'm going to shut up now. Hope this makes sense.

/r/SquaredCircle Thread Parent