potential usage doesn't really matter, it's clear what the primary purpose of the military equipment is.

Why is it clear? The primary purpose of a military is to protect the country and the people in it, even when most of the time it doesn't actively do that. If the majority of tax income goes to the defense budget, does it then mean that, according to you, all other uses of taxes are "partial", and therefore all tax payers should be killed?

doesn't seem so. the geneva convention talks about direct participation in conflict as an action that would differentiate a civilian from soldier, in my examples it's very far from direct, more like a product of technological superiority.

This is false. You do not understand what "direct participation in hostilities" means. Army technicians, intelligence officers, etc', are all regarded as having combat functions, and aren't protected by international law. In fact no member of the armed forces, other than medical or religious personnel, are protected by international law. Civilians working for the armed forces also aren't protected as long as they are actively involved in this work.

i have difficulty with this autistic culture of reddit debating, it's pretty clear what i'm talking about without wasting time with this nitpicking and literalistic reading of everything.

Yes, I've noticed that you think "making sense" and "being consistent" should be called "literalistic reading of everything". You are making an argument about A, somebody responds with A in mind, then you are claiming that the issue was never A. When you are then told that you are wrong, you blame the other side for "nitpicking and literalistic reading". There is a different name for it: you simply don't know how to articulate coherent positions. Don't try to hide it behind "reddit culture" - you wouldn't survive in any serious debate with any moderately intelligent person, regardless of setting.

you not seeing it is the same as

It's the same as being a sane person with western values. Whareas your outlook on the issue is simply the mentality of Palestinian terrorists. Literally the only people on earth who think settlers deserve to die for being settlers are Palestinian terrorists, and radical leftists such as yourself. It is a matter of fact that almost no-one in the western world shares your values, or considers your questions to be anything but extremely moronic. By the way, being "immoral", and deserving to be killed, aren't the same thing.