No, it doesn't and that is the only logical way of interpreting it.

No, it isn't. This was my comment:

I'd also remind you that there's a whole world outside Reddit in which to have 'adult discussion'

That can be read as saying that Reddit is not for adult discussion and you have the rest of the world in which to have adult discussion, or that Reddit isn't the only place in which one can engage in adult discussion i.e. someone can have 'adult discussion' outside of Reddit.

You interpreted it as the former, I intended it as the latter.

Pretty cowardly and immature attitude to have.

Not really. I've been engaging with you on this in good faith for a while now and haven't blocked you or downvoted you or reported you or said anything outrageous. It's been pretty civil and to the point.

It is EXTREMELY rare that it actually "comes to blows" as you say.

Yeah, probably but you never know.

By taking part in it, you are condoning it.

Yeah, you could definitely argue that. I dunno that I agree as I think a lot of it is unconscious in the same way that advertising is, but I see where you're coming from.

You are, just in a different way.

I'm not. You able to elaborate on this?

Just because you hear a private conversation in public, it doesn't give you the right to butt in.

You weren't having a private conversation. You insulted a random person on a public forum then exchanged a response and I responded to you. That isn't the same as just jumping into a random conversation in the pub, no matter how much you claim it to be.

Then again you have already admitted that you are the kind of person who thinks it is more acceptable to act differently online than outside of the internet.

That isn't what I said. You're arguing whether it's good or bad, I'm just saying that's how it is. I guarantee you that millions of people using the internet act differently online than they do in real life and I guarantee you that a lot of them don't even realise.