None of those are acceptable. There is no "better" here.

That is such an incredibly naive statement to make. Just because none of them are acceptable doesn't mean they are all considered the same, which has to be the case if one isn't better than the other.

That's like saying an Immortals player playing without noise cancelling headphones isn't any worse than them toggling aimhacks. Maybe you would still hold your ground, but the overwhelming majority of people would disagree with you, and it would be shown not only from the community outrage, but the fact that the player who toggled aimhacks would get banned without question. It's so strange that in this case they don't get banned for not wearing headphones when that offense is "no better" than aimhacking according to you, right?

If you want to argue that the scenarios he brought up are closer to being equal or whatever, then let me make it clear that I'm not even talking about that. I'm just responding to you saying that none of the scenarios are "better" than the other.